Untitled Document
Historical Background
A Quick Reference on Vikrampur
Map of ancient Vikrampur -1
Map of ancient Vikrampur -2
Vikrampur in prehistoric times
Under Nanda Dynasty
The Rule of Mauryan Dynasty
Under Gupta Dynasty
 
 
History & Myths of Vikrampur
 
Vikrampur Under Gupta Dynasty

After Chandragupta, his son Bindusara ascended the throne. He ruled for 25 years (298 B.c. - 273 B.C.) Prof. Sirajul Islam Lelin has stated that Bindusara had once deputed his son Ashoka to Abdullapur in Vikrampur to quell a rebellion by the local people against the government officials. There is no authentic history of Bengal (or of Vikrampur) during the five centuries between the fall of the Mauryan Empire and the rise of the Gupta dynasty (from 185 B.C. to 320 A.D.). From accounts given by Roman and Greek scholars of that period, some historians draw the conclusion that Gangaridai (of which Vikrampur formed part) continued to be a prosperous tract.

The first ruler of the Gupta dynasty was Srigupta, who was succeded by his son, Ghatotkocha. Chandragupta, son of Ghatotkocha was the next king. Then Chandragupta's son, Samudragupta ascended the throne in 335 A.D. and built an extensive empire by notching up a series of conquests that included Vanga (east Bengal). It is said by some historians that the conquests of King Raghu described by poet Kalidasa in canto IV of his "Raghuvansham" were in fact a disguised version of those of King Samudragupta. The relevant lines of the "Raghuvansham" are:

"Vanganutkhaya Tarasa Neta Nou Sadhanadyatan
Nichakhan Jayastambhan Gangasrotahantaresu Sah Apadapadmapranatah Kalama Iba Te Raghum PhaloihSangbardhayamasurutkhat Pratiropitah"

(The kings of Vanga (i.e. east Bengal) appeared in their warships to give fight to their rival Raghu, but the latter defeated them in a display of great strength and installed the column of his victory in the cluster of islands located in the stream of the Ganges. After he removed them from their positions and then restored them to their previous positions, they lay prostrate at his feet like transplanted paddy and worshipped him with vast wealth).

From all this, Jogendra Nath Gupta, author of 'Vikrampurer Itihas', concludes that the place that was thus conquered was Vikrampur. He finds added support for this view in an. inscription on a pillar kept in the Allahabad Fort, which describes Samudragupta as "Samatata-Davaka" (vanquisher of Samatata of which Vikrampur formed part). An inscription engraved on the Iron Pillar near Qutb Minar at Mehrauli (Delhi) mentions the conquests of a certain king Chandra and his suppression of a revolt by a confederacy of states in Vanga. Historians have often debated the identity of this king. While some have identified him with Chandra Varman of the Susunia Inscription, others regard him as no other than Chandragupta II or Chandragupta Vikramaditya of the Gupta dynasty, who had subdued some rulers of Vanga towards the middle of the 4th century A.D. The latter are of the view that it was from the title "Vikramaditya" of Chandragupta II that Vikrampur derived the name "Sri Vikrampur", which figures in old copper plates. Jogendra Nath Gupta does not come to a definite conclusion in this regard, though he does not rule out such a possibility.

This also conforms to a belief among the local people that Vikrampur was named after Chandragupta Vikrmaditya, whose court was adorned by poet Kalidasa. However, it is not definitely known how much control the Gupta rulers had been able to exercise over Vanga or 'Vikrampur. A Bangladesh author has claimed that Kalidasa had visited Vikrampur.



Acknowledgement: this part of the historical background of Vikrampur has been compiled from the book "In Sun and Shower" by H.A. Barari.
 
 


 
 

vikrampur.org©all rights reserved